More on White Holes

Not a physicist, blah blah.

Okay, white holes.  They are my fundamental particle.  In the course of trying to integrate how Lorentz contraction, as a waveform (and potential quantization of momentum - not sure of the relationship with the "dilaton" of Kaluza-Klein theory, but judging by the name, it may either refer to the acceleration operator (gravity field-gravity field interaction), or the momentum quanta itself, which is kind of promising), I tried to figure out why momentum and position resist simultaneous measurement.

And... white holes don't have a position.  I tried sketching out what it would look like - remembering that gravity wells are bigger on the outside, a gravity well looks like a balloon.  While you are in the black hole phase of matter, the connection between matter and the universe grows, albeit not as quickly as the interior space.  As matter approaches the white hole point, space is getting thinner, not thicker - and the white hole singularity is the point at which the balloon no longer connects to the rest of the universe at all.

But it has taken a chunk of space-time with it, leaving an irregular chunk of spacetime.  Using a fabric analogy, it is like cutting a circle out of fabric, and then sewing the circle-hole back together into a single point.  You are left with concentric rings of ripples.  These concentric rings of ripples -are- our unified field theory, basically.  And they have a center, maybe - the area of spacetime "scar tissue" where the white hole detached - but they do not have a single point where anything can be found.

Thus, position isn't quite meaningful.

Since our mass is basically a standing wave, and since momentum is a different shape of standing wave (more likely a wrinkle - that is, possessing orientation), position and momentum aren't meaningfully distinct.

That doesn't quite get us to a good conceptual understanding of uncertainty, but it is much closer than the original formulation of "Position is information which can't escape a singularity", a description which was rather unsatisfactory.

It also doesn't get us to a true concept of quantization.  For all this to work in our universe, we need a conceptual description of quantization which behaves correctly with respect to a universe with scalar symmetry - that is, which arises naturally from a continuous universe.

Still working on that.  This gets the framework a little closer, though.