First, a disclaimer: This may sound correct or obvious, but if so, it is because that is the way I write. Nothing should be taken as either factual or as representing the opinions of educated physicists.
On further consideration, electrons may not, strictly speaking, be white holes. Mass might stabilize before a repulsive singularity is achieved; assuming the electron does form an Einstein-Rosen bridge, the topology might be such that, once the event horizon reaches a point of neutrality - that is, the event horizon is exactly far enough away from the singularity that it reaches a point where attractive and repulsive forces balance - that the Einstein-Rosen bridge stabilizes and any matter or energy which would fall into the electron instead interact with the topology of the bridge itself instead.
Maybe. My thought experiments don't work very well here. I am still vacillating between electrons as matter or electrons as antimatter; depending on the assumptions made, either could work. One thing that should start to become apparent is that I don't fully grasp the implications of my model; for example, the origin of this post is noticing that, while all singularities are necessarily attractive (meaning matter and antimatter singularities must occur at different scales), and thus the wave-of-light-leaving-a-black-hole is a good approximation of the basic idea - if electrons are white holes, that would imply an entirely different structure to the waveform.
Maybe.
But I am pretty sure my model works if electrons have the waveform as I previously considered it. I don't know what the modified waveform would look like - it might work, I just don't know - and I can probably get the Einstein-Rosen bridges without white holes, so I am going to drop this in the "I haven't figured this out yet" bucket, and revise the model so it still makes sense to me, pending further thought.
No comments:
Post a Comment